Gaps in WASH

Cate Howes
05
September
2022
Output type
Report
Location
No items found.
Focus areas
Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH)
Topics
No items found.

With humanitarian emergencies occurring at increasing rates and affecting a growing number of people, evidence-based strategies and new solutions – including in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) – are vital to ensure people have their essential needs met, can live in dignity and are protected from WASH-related diseases.

‘Gaps in WASH in Humanitarian Response: 2021 Update’ reveals the most pressing WASH challenges facing communities affected by crises worldwide.

This gap analysis is informed by the most comprehensive global WASH data collection of its kind, with more than 1,700 people affected by crisis sharing their views and experiences along with almost 700 in-country WASH practitioners. In addition to this, a survey was conducted with 246 global WASH practitioners and a review of 614 academic articles and grey literature publications was completed.

The gap analysis identifies the priority gaps in humanitarian WASH systems and responses that are limiting the sector’s potential to meet essential needs, minimise WASH-related disease, restore life with dignity to people experiencing emergencies and strengthen their resilience.

The gap analysis identifies the priority gaps in humanitarian WASH systems and responses that are limiting the sector’s potential to meet essential needs, minimise WASH-related disease, restore life with dignity to people experiencing emergencies and strengthen their resilience.

The 2021 Gap Analysis package consists of four interlinked reports:


Title previous

  1. item 1
  2. item 3
  3. The Gap Analysis main research report was produced by Tufts University with support from Elrha, Oxfam, the Global WASH Cluster (GWC) and Cranfield University. It outlines the methodology and results, analyses findings, reports the main trends and offers a short discussion of implications and limitations.
  4. The addendum ‘Summary and discussion of results’ is a short provocation paper by Oxfam, GWC and Elrha that discusses some of the key findings of the Gap Analysis and aims to help the reader consider how they may respond to the findings.
  5. The ‘Gap Analysis Manuscript’ is an academic, peer-reviewed paper by Tufts University that sets out the methodology and findings. It is forthcoming (pending peer review) and a link will be shared on this page when the paper is published.
  6. The ‘Gap Analysis Database’ contains the complete dataset from the Gap Analysis research, coded and filtered to make it easily searchable. All data is anonymised and can’t be traced back to any individuals. The database can be freely downloaded and individuals taking part in the research have consented to the data being used for any purposes relating to i) identifying WASH gaps that exist in humanitarian response globally and ii) determine areas for improvement and innovation within WASH in humanitarian settings around the world.

[.slimline-cta-box][.slimline-cta_heading]Contact us[.slimline-cta_heading][.slimline-cta_paragraph]Text goes here via email[.slimline-cta_paragraph][.slimline-cta-box]

Call to action here

Supporting text

[.cta_link]Sign up to the newsletter[.cta_link]

Other resources

explore all resources
Research Snapshot: Exploring refugee compliance to COVID-19 guidelines in Uganda
Final Phase 1 Report: Supertowel
Final Phase 1 Report: Surface Water Management In Refugee Camps
Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH)
No items found.
Global
No items found.
No items found.